Einstein is not wrong on this. His theroy says that speed of light is constant and time is not. And that time is relative is already proven. For example, two clocks run synchronous. Bring one of them now into orbit, and one stays on earth. Selecting 3 Partitions in the Partition Layout menu creates three partitions of equal size. This will divide the selected partition in two 250GB partitions, to go along with the 500GB partition. Instead, you can select 2 Partitions in the menu, select one of the 500GB partitions, and then click on the + button. Mac to partition a usb external hard drive to use for booting windows 7 on a pc free. Later, the clocks show a difference, because the time in orbit proceeds slower. Hence a human living in orbit would live much longer COMPARED to the people on earth. MacOS 10.14, iOS 12, tvOS 12, and watchOS 5 are coming. But, given that High Sierra was supposed to do that to Sierra, there's some room. Mar 22, 2016 - Why do my apps keep crashing? Here's how to fix a crashing app after the macOS upgrade and a complete guide to stop app crashes at launch. But for him, his life is not longer. Just the comparison. IF it is really possible to move at a higher speed than light speed, the moving object would travel back in time, relatively for the onlooker it would move SLOWER than lightspeed. Weird stuff, huh? Now I need to build a DeLorean that makes Hyperlightspeed. No one ever said (well, ok, lots of people say it, but that's because they're misquoting someone else) that it was impossible to move faster than light. Einstein said it was impossible to accelerate to the speed of light. (as you approach the speed of light, mass approaches infinity, the whole problem is with the notion of infinite mass) While I find this tidbit interesting, it doesn't change anything or break any rules. Speed is distance/time. If time is not constant, then speed measurements are also not constant. That's the easy definition of relativity. Einstein's doing just fine. Light does have mass. Everything that exists has mass. Mapping Windows keys to Apple keyboards. Many of the keys that you'd see on a PC have equivalent keys on an Apple keyboard: Windows logo: press Command (⌘) Backspace or Delete: press Delete. Enter or ⏎: press Return. Alt (left): press Option. Alt GR (right): press Option + Control. Applications: This key isn't available on Apple keyboards. How can I install Apple Wireless Keyboard on Windows 7 x64 running on a non-Apple hardware? The operating system does see the keyboard but it doesn't want to pair with it at all. Apple wireless keyboard windows driver. How to connect an Apple wireless keyboard to Windows 10 While it may seem almost obscene to some, you can actually connect an Apple Magic keyboard to a Windows 10 machine. Using an Apple Keyboard in Windows. To be more specific, in Device Manager, under Bluetooth there is 'Apple Wireless Keyboard' but under Keyboards is 'HID Keyboard Device' which is the default driver Windows appears to be using. In fact, Scientists have just been able to measure distances at 10^-35, which is the smallest quanta possible. The reason why light moves so quickly is because it has so little mass-- anything else that is very light could be accelerated to similar speeds. However, gravity effects the laws of physics and time/space. It has been proven that a signal can be sent faster than the speed of light-- but that's not because a particle went from point A to point B by shooting it out of a cannon. It's because time/space was warped with immense magnets (to simulate gravitational effects) that altered the physical distance needed to travel. The signal, thusly, arrived BEFORE it was sent. On a large scale, Black holes allow for this time/space folding to occur. Think of it like a rubber band: if you compress the band the distance is short to travel around the circumference. The opposite is true if you stretch it. Yet, it is the same surface you are traveling on. There is an excellent issue of Scientific American than discusses the concept of time. The whole issue is devoted to it. Should be on news stands now. This is where it gets ugly: All objects, by definition of their substance have mass. The sticky bit is that objects are an illusion of frame rate. That is: the only difference between an insubstantial photon and a 'substantial' proton in terms of their substance is that (so to speak) a proton has a higher frame rate. The only reason we continue to cling to particle theory is that a). It's easier to grasp the concept and b). We are limited to equipment that cannot observe continuously, with a high enough frame rate to isolate the standing oscillation that is commonly thought of as the 'surface' of a SA particle. With that said: If every standing oscillatory point that represents what we think of as SA 'objects' has observable mass-interaction (gravitational presence) except the two least substantial than the logical conclusion is that those two are not exceptions but merely have unobservably slight mass. If photons had no mass they would not be effected by gravity. The only conclusion is that the velocity/force/mass equation in E=mc^2 is fundamentally flawed because even with infinetessamally (sp?) small mass, acceleration to what is considered functionally infinite velocity would result in nearly infinite potential energy. BTW: Ever notice that E=mc^2 is just the Newtonian calculation for discovering the potential force-at-impact calculation for a given mass? Originally posted by Frobozz Light does have mass. Everything that exists has mass. In fact, Scientists have just been able to measure distances at 10^-35, which is the smallest quanta possible. The reason why light moves so quickly is because it has so little mass-- anything else that is very light could be accelerated to similar speeds. However, gravity effects the laws of physics and time/space. It has been proven that a signal can be sent faster than the speed of light-- but that's not because a particle went from point A to point B by shooting it out of a cannon. It's because time/space was warped with immense magnets (to simulate gravitational effects) that altered the physical distance needed to travel. The signal, thusly, arrived BEFORE it was sent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |